From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brill v. Brill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 14, 1960
11 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

June 14, 1960


Judgment appealed from and the order granting summary judgment in action for declaratory judgment reversed on the law, and the motion denied, without costs to either party. The motion must be denied only because the action comes within the purview of subdivision 4 of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and the defense is not made out by documentary evidence.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, McNally and Noonan, JJ.; Stevens, J., dissents and votes to affirm on the ground that from the affidavits in opposition on the motion and plaintiff's pleading, coupled with the judgment decree, there is a sufficient showing by the defendant to satisfy the requirements for documentary evidence required by subdivision 4 of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.


Summaries of

Brill v. Brill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 14, 1960
11 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

Brill v. Brill

Case Details

Full title:RUBY BRILL, Appellant, v. JOSEPH BRILL et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1960

Citations

11 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)