From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brill v. Blakeley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 28, 1955
127 N.E.2d 96 (N.Y. 1955)

Opinion

Argued March 2, 1955

Decided April 28, 1955

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, DICKSTEIN, J.

George E. Netter, A. Joseph Geist, William Netter and Milton Waxenfeld for Florence W. Brill and others, appellants.

Simon H. Rifkind, Paul J. Newlon and Jay H. Topkis for Fred F. French Investing Co., Inc., appellant. Max J. Rubin and Abraham Levin for Charles N. Blakeley and others, appellants.

Stephen S. Bernstein for respondents.

David Regosin for Kurt E. Fontheim, intervenor-respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in the negative; third question certified answered in the affirmative; second question certified not answered. No opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.


Summaries of

Brill v. Blakeley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 28, 1955
127 N.E.2d 96 (N.Y. 1955)
Case details for

Brill v. Blakeley

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE W. BRILL et al., Suing for Themselves and All Other Stockholders…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 28, 1955

Citations

127 N.E.2d 96 (N.Y. 1955)
127 N.E.2d 96

Citing Cases

Levey v. Babb

Despite lengthy briefs, objectant has been unable to cite a single case in which any of these propositions…

Pearson v. Prospect Hill Apartments, Inc.

The contention that the court lacks jurisdiction to include the claims asserted in the derivative causes of…