Opinion
No. 3D18-2398
09-25-2019
Abraham Seno BRIL and Jose Sasson-Lerner, Appellants, v. INTERIORS BY STEVEN G., INC., Appellee.
Burstein & Associates, P.A., and Bernardo Burstein, Miami, for appellants. Law Offices of Robert P. Frankel, P.A., and Robert P. Frankel (Plantation), Miami, for appellee.
Burstein & Associates, P.A., and Bernardo Burstein, Miami, for appellants.
Law Offices of Robert P. Frankel, P.A., and Robert P. Frankel (Plantation), Miami, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (observing: "The question raised by [appellant] clearly involves underlying issues of fact. When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal").