Opinion
No. CV-09-1758-PHX-DGC.
December 8, 2009
ORDER
After the removal of this action (Dkt. #1), Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint (Dkt. #10). Defendant Maricopa County filed an answer and motion to dismiss. Dkt. ##13, 14. Plaintiffs then sought leave to file a second amended complaint in order to address the issues raised by the motion to dismiss. Dkt. #18. The Court granted the motion to amend as unopposed. Dkt. #24. Because a second amended complaint has been filed (Dkt. #26), the Court will deny as moot the County's motion to dismiss the first amended complaint.
IT IS ORDERED that Maricopa County's motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (Dkt. ##13, 14) is denied as moot.