From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brigner v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 14, 2021
No. 1:21-cv-00526-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00526-DAD-BAM

06-14-2021

BRENT ALAN BRIGNER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CLAYTON KEN WALKER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE DUE TO PLAINTIFFS' FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE, PROSECUTE, AND OBEY COURT ORDER

(Doc. No. 3)

Plaintiffs initiated this action by filing a complaint in this court on March 26, 2021, but they failed to pay the required filing fee associated with the bringing of the action. Accordingly, on March 31, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge directed plaintiffs to pay the filing fee as required or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. (Doc. No. 2.) To date, plaintiffs have neither filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the required filing fee.

Accordingly, on May 12, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, failure to prosecute this action, and failure to comply with the court's order. (Doc. No. 3.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiffs and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 2-3.) To date, no objections to the pending findings and recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, 1. The findings and recommendations issued on May 12, 2021 (Doc. No. 3) are adopted in full;

2. The action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiffs' failure to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, failure to prosecute this action, and failure to obey the court's order; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brigner v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 14, 2021
No. 1:21-cv-00526-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Brigner v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:BRENT ALAN BRIGNER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CLAYTON KEN WALKER, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 14, 2021

Citations

No. 1:21-cv-00526-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)