From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brightwell v. Whitney

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2011
459 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-7200

12-20-2011

DAVID BRIGHTWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. SCOTT WHITNEY, Chief Attorney; GERALDINE K. SWEENEY, Chief Attorney; GOVERNOR MARTIN O'MALLEY; SOMERSET COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, Defendants - Appellees.

David Brightwell, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:11-cv-01652-DKC)

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Brightwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Brightwell appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brightwell v. Whitney, No. 8:11-cv-01652-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Brightwell v. Whitney

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2011
459 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Brightwell v. Whitney

Case Details

Full title:DAVID BRIGHTWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. SCOTT WHITNEY, Chief…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 20, 2011

Citations

459 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2011)