From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brightwell v. Gang

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 22, 2022
No. 21-7751 (4th Cir. Jul. 22, 2022)

Opinion

21-7751

07-22-2022

DAVID BRIGHTWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALLEN GANG, Warden; TRUITT, Case Manager; MS. DUNSKIN; MS. SWAN; SGT. SELLMAN; COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION; F. TODD TAYLOR; SANDRA HOLMES, Administrative Officer II, Defendants - Appellees.

David Brightwell, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: May 19, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-02510-RDB)

David Brightwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

David Brightwell appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Brightwell v. Gang, No. 1:20-cv-02510-RDB (D. Md. Dec. 1, 2021). We also deny Brightwell's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Brightwell v. Gang

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 22, 2022
No. 21-7751 (4th Cir. Jul. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Brightwell v. Gang

Case Details

Full title:DAVID BRIGHTWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALLEN GANG, Warden; TRUITT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 22, 2022

Citations

No. 21-7751 (4th Cir. Jul. 22, 2022)

Citing Cases

Brightwell v. Temesgen

He has also litigated appeals in which his motions for counsel were summarily denied. See Brightwell v.…

Brightwell v. Temesgen

He has also litigated appeals in which his motions for counsel were summarily denied. See Brightwell v.…