Opinion
144 CA 21-00346
03-11-2022
THE ZOGHLIN GROUP, PLLC, ROCHESTER (MINDY L. ZOGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS TOWN OF BRIGHTON PLANNING BOARD, TOWN OF BRIGHTON TOWN BOARD, AND TOWN OF BRIGHTON. WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (JOHN C. NUTTER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS M & F, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., AND DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, COLLECTIVELY DOING BUSINESS AS DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES.
THE ZOGHLIN GROUP, PLLC, ROCHESTER (MINDY L. ZOGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS TOWN OF BRIGHTON PLANNING BOARD, TOWN OF BRIGHTON TOWN BOARD, AND TOWN OF BRIGHTON.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (JOHN C. NUTTER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS M & F, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., AND DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, COLLECTIVELY DOING BUSINESS AS DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered February 4, 2021. Petitioner-plaintiff "appeals from that part of the... [o]rder that did not enjoin the Town of Brighton from issuing any more permits/certificates until the traffic mitigation measures were complete."
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot (see e.g. Matter of Hool v Collins, 34 N.Y.2d 617, 617 [1974]; Matter of Samantha WW. v Gerald XX., 107 A.D.3d 1313, 1315 [3d Dept 2013]; Matter of Harper v Fischer, 67 A.D.3d 1279, 1280 n [3d Dept 2009]).