From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brighton Const. Inc. v. L J Enterprises

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jan 4, 1974
126 N.J. Super. 186 (App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

Argued November 19, 1973 —

Decided January 4, 1974.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, whose opinion is reported at 121 N.J. Super. 152.

Before Judges LYNCH, MEHLER and MICHELS.

Mr. Richard K. Rosenberg argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent ( Heller Laiks, attorneys; Mr. Richard K. Rosenberg, of counsel, and Mr. Herbert R. Ezor, on the brief).

Mr. Robert B. Hermes argued the cause for appellant ( Hermes Gitlin, attorneys; Mr. Robert B. Hermes of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Milton C. Yarrow argued the cause for third-party defendant-respondent.

Before Judges LYNCH, MEHLER and MICHELS.


The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kole.


Summaries of

Brighton Const. Inc. v. L J Enterprises

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jan 4, 1974
126 N.J. Super. 186 (App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Brighton Const. Inc. v. L J Enterprises

Case Details

Full title:BRIGHTON CONSTRUCTION, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. L J ENTERPRISES…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jan 4, 1974

Citations

126 N.J. Super. 186 (App. Div. 1974)
313 A.2d 617

Citing Cases

State v. Bartek

Incident to such action the municipality might have sought a temporary restraint against the defendant's…

Brighton Construction v. L J Enterprises

Petition for certification denied. (See 126 N.J. Super. 186)…