From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bright & Varick Urban Renewal Co. v. Jersey City Planning Bd.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 8, 2017
177 A.3d 110 (N.J. 2017)

Opinion

C–401 September Term 2017 079679

12-08-2017

BRIGHT AND VARICK URBAN RENEWAL COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. JERSEY CITY PLANNING BOARD, Jersey City Zoning Board of Adjustment, the Mayor and Council of the City of Jersey City, Robert Byrne, in His Official Capacity as City Clerk, Anthony Cruz, in His Official Capacity as Director, Housing Economic Development and Commerce and City of Jersey City, Defendants. Van Vorst Park Association, Inc., Intervener–Petitioner.


To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-002040-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Bright & Varick Urban Renewal Co. v. Jersey City Planning Bd.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 8, 2017
177 A.3d 110 (N.J. 2017)
Case details for

Bright & Varick Urban Renewal Co. v. Jersey City Planning Bd.

Case Details

Full title:BRIGHT AND VARICK URBAN RENEWAL COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff–Respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Dec 8, 2017

Citations

177 A.3d 110 (N.J. 2017)
231 N.J. 528