From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bright v. United States

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 23, 2021
2:21-CV-144-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Nov. 23, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-144-Z-BR

11-23-2021

CRISTY MARIE BRIGHT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

MATTHEW J. KACSMARYK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation (“FCR”) report of the United States Magistrate Judge to dismiss the Motion to Vacate by Petitioner in this case (ECF No. 6). No objections to the FCR have been filed. After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, the Court concludes that the FCR of the Magistrate Judge is correct. It is therefore ORDERED that the FCR of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and the Motion to Vacate is dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bright v. United States

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 23, 2021
2:21-CV-144-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Nov. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Bright v. United States

Case Details

Full title:CRISTY MARIE BRIGHT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Nov 23, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-144-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Nov. 23, 2021)