From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bright v. City of Phila.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 20, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-5304 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-5304

12-20-2018

SHERMAN L. BRIGHT v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM

This is a civil rights action in which there is strong evidence that Plaintiff Sherman Bright was improperly held in custody in Delaware County Pennsylvania for a period of 12 days without legal cause. From the outset of the case, counsel for Plaintiff has had difficulty in conducting discovery in a way that would identify parties who might bear responsibility for Plaintiff's wrongful confinement. In particular, counsel failed to identify the authorities in Delaware County who sought to enforce what appears to have been an invalid warrant, holding him in custody there without making appropriate inquiries.

In a series of conference calls with counsel, the Court expressed concern about progress in this case, and following one such conference on May 12, 2017, ordered the City of Philadelphia to conduct a records inquiry that might advance investigation into Plaintiff's claim. The City complied. The Court also directed counsel for various Delaware County defendants to produce to Plaintiff any documents they had identified concerning his transport and incarceration. Counsel complied. On March 1, 2018, a hearing was held in open court on the record, and I expressed my continuing concern about the conduct of this case on the part of Plaintiff's counsel. Subsequently, I ordered the City of Philadelphia to produce for deposition the two officers it had identified as being involved with Plaintiff's request. The City did so, producing the one officer who had any memory of the event, and has in fact complied with every request the Court has made in furtherance of an investigation into this case. Since that deposition was completed, no steps have been taken in pursuit of this case.

Having made multiple efforts to facilitate a resolution of this case on its merits, the Court ordered a rule to show cause why it should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute on November 20, 2018. No cause having been shown, and the Court having no confidence that counsel for Plaintiff can advance the prosecution of this case, I have entered an order of dismissal.

/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh

United States District Judge

12/20/18


Summaries of

Bright v. City of Phila.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 20, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-5304 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Bright v. City of Phila.

Case Details

Full title:SHERMAN L. BRIGHT v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 20, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-5304 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2018)