From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bright v. City & Cnty. of San Fran.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 12, 2011
Case No. CI 1-01586 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CI 1-01586 EMC

10-12-2011

JNANA BRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GEORGE, GASCON, BUDDY SIGUIDO and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive, Defendants.

DANIEL S. SHARP Attorneys for Plaintiff JNANA BRIGHT Pursuant to General Order 45, the filer of this document attests that he has received the concurrence of this signatory to file this document. DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER Chief Trial Deputy BLAKE P. LOEBS Chief of Civil Rights Litigation BLAKE P. LOEBS Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GEORGE GASCON and BUDDY SIGUIDO


DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Deputy

BLAKE P. LOEBS, State Bar #145790

Chief of Civil Rights Litigation

SEAN F. CONNOLLY, State Bar #152235

Deputy City Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

GEORGE GASCON and BUDDY SIGUIDO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

DEADLINE

Trial Date: NONE

A settlement conference is presently scheduled for October 27, 2011, in the above captioned case. A trial date has not been set.

For the below stated reasons, counsel for the parties agree and stipulate that the conference be continued to a date mutually agreeable to the Court's availability and counsel.

Discovery has not yet been completed. The parties believe that provision of responses to existing discovery requests is necessary before a meaningful settlement conference can occur and defendants have run into unforeseen obstacles in getting the discovery produced to Plaintiff in time for the settlement conference.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES:

DANIEL S. SHARP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JNANA BRIGHT

Pursuant to General Order 45, the filer of this document

attests that he has received the concurrence of this

signatory to file this document.

DENNIS J. HERRERA

City Attorney

JOANNE HOEPER

Chief Trial Deputy

BLAKE P. LOEBS

Chief of Civil Rights Litigation

BLAKE P. LOEBS

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

GEORGE GASCON and BUDDY SIGUIDO

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Settlement Conference deadline of 10/25/11 is extended to 12/21/11.

Parties shall contact Judge Vadas for a new settlement conference date

EDWARD M. CHEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bright v. City & Cnty. of San Fran.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 12, 2011
Case No. CI 1-01586 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Bright v. City & Cnty. of San Fran.

Case Details

Full title:JNANA BRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GEORGE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 12, 2011

Citations

Case No. CI 1-01586 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)