From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brigham v. Batts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 6, 2014
3:14-CV-1418-O-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2014)

Summary

dismissing without prejudice section 2241 habeas petition seeking credit for 20-month spent in state custody (same issue as in this case) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies

Summary of this case from United States v. Brigham

Opinion

3:14-CV-1418-O-BK

08-06-2014

DWAYNE BRIGHAM, #46056-177, Petitioner, v. MYRON BATTS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. Having reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error, the Court finds none and ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Because Petitioner filed his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, he is not required to obtain a certificate of appealability in the event of an appeal. Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 425 (5th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). However, the Court prospectively CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). In the event of an appeal, Plaintiff/Petitioner may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5).

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if the district court certifies an appeal as not taken in good faith.

SO ORDERED on this 6th day of August, 2014.

/s/_________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brigham v. Batts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 6, 2014
3:14-CV-1418-O-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2014)

dismissing without prejudice section 2241 habeas petition seeking credit for 20-month spent in state custody (same issue as in this case) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies

Summary of this case from United States v. Brigham
Case details for

Brigham v. Batts

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE BRIGHAM, #46056-177, Petitioner, v. MYRON BATTS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 6, 2014

Citations

3:14-CV-1418-O-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Brigham

Defendant must also exhaust his administrative remedies before seeking habeas relief under section 2241. See…