From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Briggs v. UNESCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2020
No. 2:20-cv-00494-TLN-CKD PS (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:20-cv-00494-TLN-CKD PS

05-13-2020

VICKI BRIGGS, Plaintiff, v. UNESCO, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed March 30, 2020, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings ///// ///// ///// and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: May 13, 2020

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16/brig0494.fta


Summaries of

Briggs v. UNESCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2020
No. 2:20-cv-00494-TLN-CKD PS (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Briggs v. UNESCO

Case Details

Full title:VICKI BRIGGS, Plaintiff, v. UNESCO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 13, 2020

Citations

No. 2:20-cv-00494-TLN-CKD PS (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2020)