From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brifiel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 22, 2006
920 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D05-4210.

February 22, 2006.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Burton C. Connor, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 561993CF000504A, 561994CF001631A, 561996 CF003692A.

David M. Lamos of Law Offices of David M. Lamos, Fort Pierce, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motions for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, because they were impermissibly filed beyond the two-year time limitation. However, as it appears the trial court has never ruled on appellant's supplemental motion filed March 16, 2004, our affirmance is without prejudice to obtaining a ruling on the supplemental motion.

Affirmed.

WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brifiel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 22, 2006
920 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Brifiel v. State

Case Details

Full title:Prosper BRIFIEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 22, 2006

Citations

920 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)