From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brienza v. Unity Amusement Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

May, 1936.


Order denying on condition defendant's motion to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. No affidavit of plaintiff was submitted on the motion. There is not an adequate showing of merits, nor does the nature or extent of plaintiff's injuries appear. In view of the statement in plaintiff's attorney's affidavit as to plaintiff's impoverished condition, he should have applied to sue as a poor person. In our opinion it was an improper exercise of discretion to deny the motion. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brienza v. Unity Amusement Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Brienza v. Unity Amusement Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO BRIENZA, Respondent, v. UNITY AMUSEMENT CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)