From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridgewater v. Dekalb Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 7, 2011
No. 11-mc-80265 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-mc-80265 WHA

11-07-2011

SHARON BRIDGEWATER, Plaintiff, v. DEKALB COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


NOTICE REGARDING MOTION TO TRANSFER

In this miscellaneous matter, plaintiff's complaint was reviewed pursuant to a previous order that imposed a pre-filing screening requirement for all of plaintiff's complaints. The complaint was allowed to pass pre-filing review (Dkt. No. 3). Thus, a new action will be commenced and the complaint will be assigned a civil docket number different from the miscellaneous matter number listed above.

Plaintiff now has filed a motion in this miscellaneous matter seeking "to transfer [this] case to Northern District Court of Georgia" [sic]. Plaintiff states that she "filed the case in at the wrong federal district court" [sic] (Dkt. No. 4). The filing of a motion to transfer in this miscellaneous matter was improper. Plaintiff must file any such motion in the new civil action. Or, plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss her complaint without prejudice to re-filing it in Georgia. No further action will be taken as to the improper motion to transfer filed in this docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bridgewater v. Dekalb Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 7, 2011
No. 11-mc-80265 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Bridgewater v. Dekalb Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:SHARON BRIDGEWATER, Plaintiff, v. DEKALB COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 7, 2011

Citations

No. 11-mc-80265 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2011)