From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridges v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 30, 2017
Case No. CV 14-9628-SJO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-9628-SJO (JEM)

05-30-2017

JASON NELVES BRIDGES, Petitioner, v. CC THOMAS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: May 30, 2017

/s/_________

S. JAMES OTERO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bridges v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 30, 2017
Case No. CV 14-9628-SJO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Bridges v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:JASON NELVES BRIDGES, Petitioner, v. CC THOMAS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 30, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 14-9628-SJO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2017)