From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Clinton

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jul 17, 2006
No. 3:01-0992 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. 3:01-0992.

July 17, 2006


ORDER


Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered June 6, 2006 (Docket No. 91), Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 97), Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants George Clinton d/b/a Exoskeletal Music and Tic Free Music's Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 99), Defendant's Objections to the Report and Recommendation of June 6, 2006 (Docket No. 92), and Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 101). The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's findings, the objections and the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

The objections (Docket Nos. 97, 99, 92 and 101) are OVERRULED, and the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 91) is ADOPTED and APPROVED.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Docket No. 81) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Docket No. 81) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Action (Docket No. 64) is GRANTED.

This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for entry of a scheduling order and to set a target trial date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Clinton

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jul 17, 2006
No. 3:01-0992 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Clinton

Case Details

Full title:BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC., ET AL. v. GEORGE CLINTON, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jul 17, 2006

Citations

No. 3:01-0992 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2006)