From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. Ganim

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 17, 2011
303 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-17

BRIDGEPORT HARBOUR PLACE I, LLC v. Joseph P. GANIM et al.

William F. Gallagher, New Haven, Hugh D. Hughes, William J. Sweeney, New Britain, and R. Bartley Halloran, Farmington, in support of the petition. Jeffrey J. Mirman and John F. Droney, Farmington, in opposition.


William F. Gallagher, New Haven, Hugh D. Hughes, William J. Sweeney, New Britain, and R. Bartley Halloran, Farmington, in support of the petition. Jeffrey J. Mirman and John F. Droney, Farmington, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn.App. 99, 30 A.3d 703, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's exclusion of evidence of lost profits?”

ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT and EVELEIGH, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. Ganim

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 17, 2011
303 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2011)
Case details for

Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. Ganim

Case Details

Full title:BRIDGEPORT HARBOUR PLACE I, LLC v. Joseph P. GANIM et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

303 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2011)
31 A.3d 1179

Citing Cases

Tomick v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

We note further that, to the extent that the claims raise questions of law, our review is plenary. See…

State v. Lanier

(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. Ganim , 131 Conn. App. 99, 123, 30…