From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridgeford v. Varano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 15, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0372 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0372

08-15-2012

SHERWOOD BRIDGEFORD v. DAVID VARANO, et al


ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 9), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (Document No. 12), the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The petitioner's objections are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

_______________

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.


Summaries of

Bridgeford v. Varano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 15, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0372 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Bridgeford v. Varano

Case Details

Full title:SHERWOOD BRIDGEFORD v. DAVID VARANO, et al

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 15, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0372 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2012)