From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridge v. Credit One Fin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 8, 2015
Case No. 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK (D. Nev. Jun. 8, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK

06-08-2015

WILLIAM BRIDGE, Plaintiff(s), v. CREDIT ONE FINANCIAL, Defendant(s).


ORDER (Docket No. 58)

Pending before the Court is Defendant's motion to quash a subpoena served by Plaintiff upon non-party NCO Financial Systems. Docket No. 58. Plaintiff filed a response and Defendant filed a reply. Docket Nos. 70, 73. In its reply, Defendant concedes that the "[s]ubpoena to NCO identifies Pennsylvania as the location for compliance." Docket No. 73, at 1-2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(3), this Court lacks jurisdiction to resolve a motion to quash when the place where compliance is required is located in another district. See Agincourt Gaming, LLC v. Zynga, Inc., 2014 WL 4079555, at *3 (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2014); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(3)(A)-(B) (a motion to quash or modify a subpoena is directed to "the court for the district where compliance is required"). Defendant refiled the motion to quash in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and, on May 19, 2015, that motion was adjudicated. See Docket No. 83-1. Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash (Docket No. 58) is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 8, 2015

/s/_________

NANCY J. KOPPE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Bridge v. Credit One Fin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 8, 2015
Case No. 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK (D. Nev. Jun. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Bridge v. Credit One Fin.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BRIDGE, Plaintiff(s), v. CREDIT ONE FINANCIAL, Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 8, 2015

Citations

Case No. 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK (D. Nev. Jun. 8, 2015)