From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridge Hardware Co., Inc. v. Trager

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 1956
1 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

February 24, 1956


Order granting leave to increase the damages claimed in the complaint, unanimously reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion denied, without prejudice to a new application upon proper papers. The moving papers contain only conclusory statements by one who is not shown to have knowledge of the facts. Proper papers would require averment by a person or persons, shown to have knowledge of the facts, and detailing the dates when the strike began and when it ended, when the facts were first learned of the claimed increased damages and the circumstances under which such knowledge was acquired.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Botein, Cox and Frank, JJ.


Summaries of

Bridge Hardware Co., Inc. v. Trager

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 1956
1 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Bridge Hardware Co., Inc. v. Trager

Case Details

Full title:BRIDGE HARDWARE CO., INC., Respondent, v. PHILIP TRAGER et al., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 24, 1956

Citations

1 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

Teplitsky v. Kamensky

The exercise of the power to grant leave to amend a pleading should be grounded on a showing of lack of full…

KOI v. P.S. M. CATERING CORP

Further, on an application of this nature there should be submitted plaintiff's affidavit of merits showing…