From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brickman v. American Bridge Fabricators

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Aug 20, 1956
124 A.2d 852 (D.C. 1956)

Opinion

No. 1845.

Argued July 30, 1956.

Decided August 20, 1956.

APPEAL FROM MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CIVIL DIVISION, HARRY L. WALKER, J.

Frank Paley, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Max Malin, Washington, D.C., for appellees.

Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.


This case was tried before a jury; the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the corporate defendant and for the plaintiff on the first count of the individual defendant's counterclaim. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff both on his claim against the individual defendant and on the second count of the latter's counterclaim.

Thereafter the individual defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial; the court, after argument of counsel, denied the motion for judgment but granted the motion for a new trial on all issues raised by the pleadings; an appropriate order was entered and the appeal is from that order.

The order of the court in granting the new trial is not a final order and is therefore not appealable.

Students Book Co. v. Semerjian, D.C.Mun.App., 66 A.2d 487; Phillips v. Marvin's Credit, Inc., D.C.Mun.App., 35 A.2d 825.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Brickman v. American Bridge Fabricators

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Aug 20, 1956
124 A.2d 852 (D.C. 1956)
Case details for

Brickman v. American Bridge Fabricators

Case Details

Full title:Jess BRICKMAN, Appellant, v. AMERICAN BRIDGE FABRICATORS, Inc., a…

Court:Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Date published: Aug 20, 1956

Citations

124 A.2d 852 (D.C. 1956)

Citing Cases

Morfessis v. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co.

As a general rule this court's jurisdiction is restricted to the review of final orders or judgments. Code…

Fisher v. Best

After the plaintiffs prevailed at the second trial, the defendants filed the present ripe and timely appeal.…