From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brice v. Plain Green, LLC

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jun 6, 2022
35 F.4th 1219 (9th Cir. 2022)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

rejecting Howard as unsound

Summary of this case from Faucett v. Warden, FCI Ashland
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

No. 19-15707

06-06-2022

Kimetra BRICE; Earl Browne; Jill Novorot, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PLAIN GREEN, LLC, Defendant, and Haynes Investments, LLC; L. Stephen Haynes, Defendants-Appellants.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge

ORDER

:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judge Koh did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Summaries of

Brice v. Plain Green, LLC

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jun 6, 2022
35 F.4th 1219 (9th Cir. 2022)

rejecting Howard as unsound

Summary of this case from Faucett v. Warden, FCI Ashland

In Mendez, a defendant was convicted of attempted sexual exploitation of a minor based on evidence that he inserted a camera into the eye of a stuffed animal, placed the stuffed animal in the bedroom of his girlfriend's fourteen-year-old daughter, and recorded the girl "without her knowledge or participation."

Summary of this case from United States v. Boam
Case details for

Brice v. Plain Green, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Kimetra BRICE; Earl Browne; Jill Novorot, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PLAIN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

35 F.4th 1219 (9th Cir. 2022)

Citing Cases

United States v. Mendez

The following background facts are taken from the Ninth Circuit's opinion, United States v. Mendez, 35 …

United States v. Davis

. The Court ordered the parties to file supplemental briefing on the affect, if any, of United States…

9 Citing Cases