From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Briarmoon v. Municipality of Janesville

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 21, 2006
06-C-246-S (W.D. Wis. Jun. 21, 2006)

Opinion

06-C-246-S.

June 21, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a civil action in this Court and moves for appointment of counsel. Defendant's motion to dismiss is pending before this Court.

In Darden v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., 797 F. 2d 497, 500 (7th Cir. 1986), the Court held that in deciding whether to appoint counsel for pro se litigants three factors must be considered. These factors include the merits of plaintiff's claim, the diligence of plaintiff in attempting to obtain counsel and the financial ability of the plaintiff to retain counsel.

Plaintiff has not demonstrated that she has attempted to obtain counsel and that she is indigent. In addition, the merits of plaintiff's claim do not warrant appointment of counsel.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.


Summaries of

Briarmoon v. Municipality of Janesville

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 21, 2006
06-C-246-S (W.D. Wis. Jun. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Briarmoon v. Municipality of Janesville

Case Details

Full title:K. ANDREAH BRIARMOON, Plaintiff, v. MUNICIPALITY OF JANESVILLE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 21, 2006

Citations

06-C-246-S (W.D. Wis. Jun. 21, 2006)