From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brian M. v. Recontrust Co. N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 26, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1477 GEB DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1477 GEB DAD PS

08-26-2011

BRIAN M. and JANELLE R. PAVEY, Plaintiffs, v. RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants.


ORDER VACATING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

On August 26, 2011, the court heard argument on defendant's properly noticed motion to strike portions of plaintiffs' complaint and motion to dismiss the complaint.1 The motions were taken under submission and written findings and recommendations will be issued in due course .

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set in this matter for October 7, 2011 is vacated, and the parties are not required to file status reports.

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Brian M. v. Recontrust Co. N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 26, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1477 GEB DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Brian M. v. Recontrust Co. N.A.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN M. and JANELLE R. PAVEY, Plaintiffs, v. RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 26, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1477 GEB DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)