From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brian A. v. Bredesen

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, at Nashville
Oct 16, 2009
NO. 3:00-0445 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 16, 2009)

Summary

explaining that standing is a "claim-by-claim issue"

Summary of this case from Memphis A. Phillip Randolph Inst. v. Hargett

Opinion

NO. 3:00-0445.

October 16, 2009


ORDER


Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order or, in the Alternative, for a Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 296). The Court held a hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion on October 13, 2009. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Plaintiffs' Motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brian A. v. Bredesen

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, at Nashville
Oct 16, 2009
NO. 3:00-0445 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 16, 2009)

explaining that standing is a "claim-by-claim issue"

Summary of this case from Memphis A. Phillip Randolph Inst. v. Hargett
Case details for

Brian A. v. Bredesen

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN A., et al. v. PHIL BREDESEN, et al

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, at Nashville

Date published: Oct 16, 2009

Citations

NO. 3:00-0445 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Memphis A. Phillip Randolph Inst. v. Hargett

Price v. Medicaid Director , 838 F.3d 739, 746 (6th Cir. 2016) ("It is black-letter law that standing is a…