From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BRIA v. CURRY

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 2, 2008
1:06-cv-01334-AWI-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2008)

Opinion

1:06-cv-01334-AWI-TAG (HC).

May 2, 2008


ORDER GRANTING IN PART PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE (Doc. 18) ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER TO FILE TRAVERSE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 14, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion to extend time of sixty days within which to file his traverse. (Doc. 18). Petitioner contends that the time allowed for him to use the prison law library is currently restricted.

The Court normally grants extensions of time, upon a showing of good cause, in thirty-day increments. Good cause having been presented to the Court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for extension of time is GRANTED IN PART. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to file his traverse.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BRIA v. CURRY

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 2, 2008
1:06-cv-01334-AWI-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2008)
Case details for

BRIA v. CURRY

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT JOHN BRIA, Petitioner, v. BEN CURRY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 2, 2008

Citations

1:06-cv-01334-AWI-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2008)