From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brewer v. Madden

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 27, 2022
22-cv-02577-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-02577-WHO (PR)

07-27-2022

KEVIN DEAN BREWER, aka MICHAEL GREEN, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL DKT. NOS. 9 AND 10

WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge.

Petitioner Kevin Dean Brewer has not paid the $5.00 filing fee by July 1, 2022 after being ordered to do so. (Order Denying Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Dkt. No. 8.) Accordingly, this federal habeas action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to pay the filing fee, and for failing to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Brewer may file a motion to reopen. Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page; and (ii) be accompanied by full payment for the $5.00 filing fee.

Brewer's renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. (Dkt. No. 9.) As I determined in a prior order, Brewer's prison trust account statement shows a current balance of $618.93, and an average monthly balance of $386.03. (Dkt. No. 8.)

Brewer's request “for a 14.50,” which is a request that the Court issue an Order to Show Cause without payment of the filing fee, is DENIED. (Dkt. No. 10.)

The Clerk terminate all pending motions, enter judgment in favor of respondent, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brewer v. Madden

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 27, 2022
22-cv-02577-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Brewer v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN DEAN BREWER, aka MICHAEL GREEN, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 27, 2022

Citations

22-cv-02577-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2022)