From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brewer v. Livingston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Feb 20, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-1161 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-1161

02-20-2014

JINDARAT BREWER, Petitioner, v. BRAD LIVINGSTON, et al, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation on the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Ayegbusi Daniels and Joe Lopez and on the motion for alternative service filed by the plaintiff Brewer. The United States Magistrate Judge signed the Memorandum and Recommendation on February 4, 2014. No objections have been filed. This court has made a de novo determination of the motions. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court's Memorandum and Order. This court denies the defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 36). The Magistrate Judge properly granted the plaintiff's motion for extension of time to effect service (Docket Entry No. 35), and service has been effected.

SIGNED on February 20, 2014, at Houston, Texas.

__________

Lee H. Rosenthal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brewer v. Livingston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Feb 20, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-1161 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Brewer v. Livingston

Case Details

Full title:JINDARAT BREWER, Petitioner, v. BRAD LIVINGSTON, et al, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Feb 20, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-1161 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 2014)