From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brewer v. Fay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 24, 1936
55 P.2d 1035 (Okla. 1936)

Opinion

No. 26773.

March 24, 1936.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Motion to Dissolve Garnishment and Rulings Thereon not Reviewable on Transcript.

A motion to dissolve garnishment and rulings and orders made thereon cannot be reviewed in this court by transcript.

Appeal from Superior Court, Okmulgee County; Harland A. Carter, Judge.

Action for personal injury by Genella Brewer, a minor, by her father and next friend, Don Brewer, against John Fay. From a judgment discharging the garnishee, plaintiff appeals. Dismissed.

Joe S. Eaton, for plaintiff in error.

Kenneth B. Kienzle, for defendant in error.


This is an appeal from an order dissolving garnishment and discharging garnishee. The appeal is by transcript. A motion to dismiss has been filed which states that under Exchange National Bank v. Merritt, 108 Okla. 184, 235 P. 180, this court will not review the error of which complaint is made. A response to the motion to dismiss was ordered by this court, but none has been filed. It appears from the authorities cited that the errors complained of cannot be reviewed on transcript.

The appeal is dismissed.

McNEILL, C. J., and BAYLESS, PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brewer v. Fay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 24, 1936
55 P.2d 1035 (Okla. 1936)
Case details for

Brewer v. Fay

Case Details

Full title:BREWER v. FAY

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 24, 1936

Citations

55 P.2d 1035 (Okla. 1936)
55 P.2d 1035