From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brewer v. Dodson Aviation

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
May 31, 2006
No. CV 04-2189 Z (W.D. Wash. May. 31, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV 04-2189 Z.

May 31, 2006

Thomas A. Peppler Thomas A. Peppler, P.C. Phoenix, AZ, Attorneys for Defendant Warrior Aircraft.

David D. Swartling, WSBA # 6972 Mills Meyers Swartling Seattle, WA, Attorneys for Defendant, Warrior Aircraft.


ORDER GRANTING WARRIOR ENTERPRISES, INC, DBA ARIZONA AIRCRAFT ACCESSORIES AND PARTS, AND DBA PRECISION MANUFACTURED AIRCRAFT PARTS, LLC; ARIZONA AIRCRAFT ACCESSORIES AND PARTS; AND PRECISION MANUFACTURED AIRCRAFT PARTS, LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


THIS MATTER came before the Court on Warrior Enterprises, Inc., dba Arizona Aircraft Accessories and Parts, and dba Precision Manufactured Aircraft Parts LLC; Arizona Aircraft Accessories and Parts; and Precision Manufactured Aircraft Parts, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court considered the files and pleadings herein, including the following:

1. Motion for Summary Judgment of Dismissal by the Warrior defendants;
2. Declaration of Thomas A. Peppler in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Dismissal by Warrior defendants (including Exhibit A (Letter of Agreement signed on February 22, 2006, dated February 22, 2006) and Exhibit B (Declaration of Myron Brown, dated March 10, 2206));
3. Plaintiffs Brewers et al.'s Response to and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of Dismissal of Warrior defendants;
4. Declaration of Louis S. Franecke in Response to and in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of Dismissal of Warrior defendants;
5. Amended Declaration of Thomas A. Peppler in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Dismissal of Warrior defendants (and Exhibits A and B thereto);
6. Defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation's Response to Warrior defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of Dismissal of the Warrior defendants.

Because there are no genuine issues of material fact, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Warrior defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Dkt. No. 74, is GRANTED and the following parties are dismissed with prejudice:

1. Warrior Enterprises, Inc., dba Arizona Aircraft Accessories and Parts, and dba Precision Manufactured Aircraft Parts, LLC;

2. Arizona Aircraft Accessories and Parts; and

3. Precision Manufactured Aircraft Parts, LLC.


Summaries of

Brewer v. Dodson Aviation

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
May 31, 2006
No. CV 04-2189 Z (W.D. Wash. May. 31, 2006)
Case details for

Brewer v. Dodson Aviation

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW J. BREWER, Personal Representative of the Heirs and the Estate of…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: May 31, 2006

Citations

No. CV 04-2189 Z (W.D. Wash. May. 31, 2006)