From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bretz v. United States

United States District Court, District of Montana
Oct 29, 2021
CV 19-73-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Oct. 29, 2021)

Opinion

CV 19-73-BLG-SPW

10-29-2021

L.R. BRETZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, an Ohio corporation; BILLINGS CLINIC, a Montana non-profit corporation; CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; FISCHER & ERWIN, a Montana corporation; and BAUMGARDNER-LIND ADJUSTORS, INC., a Montana corporation, Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

SUSAN P. WATTERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Plaintiff Bretz's Motion for Reconsideration. (Doc. 49). Local Civil Rule 7.3(a) requires prior leave from the Court before filing a motion for reconsideration. Local Civil Rule 7.3(b) requires that such motions shall be limited to 2, 275 words and must specify that there has either been a change in facts or applicable law presented to the Court in the original motion. Bretz has failed to demonstrate that either prong is met here. The Court also notes that the motion appears to violate Local Rule 7.3(c), which prohibits repetition of argument made on the underlying motion.

Adherence to this local rule will allow the Court, and the parties, to handle matters more expeditiously. Compliance with the local rule shall be required. A mere adverse outcome for one party is not sufficient to support reconsideration. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Bretz's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 49) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Bretz v. United States

United States District Court, District of Montana
Oct 29, 2021
CV 19-73-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Oct. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Bretz v. United States

Case Details

Full title:L.R. BRETZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN MEDICAL…

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Oct 29, 2021

Citations

CV 19-73-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Oct. 29, 2021)