From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brett v. Trump

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 25, 2024
5:24-cv-281-TJC-PRL (M.D. Fla. Jul. 25, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-281-TJC-PRL

07-25-2024

FRANK BRETT, Plaintiff, v. DON TRUMP, WILLIAM BAHR, DAVID SAMSON, BILL BARONI, ANN KELLY BRIDGET, DAVID FOX, JEFF EPSTEIN, MARK EPSTEIN, FNI CHOP, JUDITH MCCOLLOUGH, FNU ROADS, FNU KNIGHT, FNU WATERS, FNU EARLY, PETER MOORE, NC Clerk, ROBERT ROCKFELL, Salvation Army, FNU MOURRONY, TOM PETTY, Citra Mission and Employees, FNU HALL, Rev -Orlando Fl Rescue Mission, JOHN MORGAN, Attorney, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, Jacksonville Employees, J.P. MORGAN, CHRISTINE SABLE, and JANE DOE, Sister of Christine Sabel, Defendants.


ORDER

TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation by the assigned United States Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, dismissing the case without leave to amend, terminating the Motion to Add Evidence, and prohibiting Plaintiff Frank Brett from filing additional cases in the Ocala Division of the Court before prescreening by the Magistrate Judge. Doc. 4. No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time in which to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Upon de novo review of the file and for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Doc. 4, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 4, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

2. The Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Doc. 2, is DENIED.

3. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

4. Frank Brett is PROHIBITED from filing additional cases in the Ocala Division of the Court before prescreening by the Magistrate Judge. If Brett attempts to file a complaint in the Ocala Division, the complaint is subject to the following prescreening procedures:

a. The clerk must forward the complaint to the Magistrate Judge in the Ocala Division for preliminary review and screening. The Magistrate Judge will determine whether the complaint has arguable merit.
b. If the Magistrate Judge finds the complaint has arguable merit, the Magistrate Judge will issue an order to that effect and direct the clerk to file the complaint for normal assignment. The Magistrate Judge's order will be docketed along with the complaint in the new civil case.
c. If the Magistrate Judge finds the complaint has no arguable merit, the Magistrate Judge will issue an order stating such findings and enter the order in this file. The clerk will enter a copy of the complaint in this file and, if feasible, return the original complaint to Brett.
d. If the complaint is found to be meritless, Brett may be subject to monetary sanctions, other sanctions, or both, as the Court deems appropriate.

5. The clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the Motion to Add Evidence, Doc. 3, and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brett v. Trump

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 25, 2024
5:24-cv-281-TJC-PRL (M.D. Fla. Jul. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Brett v. Trump

Case Details

Full title:FRANK BRETT, Plaintiff, v. DON TRUMP, WILLIAM BAHR, DAVID SAMSON, BILL…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jul 25, 2024

Citations

5:24-cv-281-TJC-PRL (M.D. Fla. Jul. 25, 2024)