From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brest v. Broslan Jewelry Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 1948
274 App. Div. 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

October 18, 1948.

Present — Peck, P.J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.


It was error to direct a nonsuit upon the ground that the evidence established that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. (See Hente v. Shercoop Corp., 289 N.Y. 140; Heimer v. Stento, 270 App. Div. 665; Richards v. Robert Corp., 271 App. Div. 924, affd. 297 N.Y. 605; Barnett v. 41-43 East 28th St. Corp., 271 App. Div. 749.) Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.


Summaries of

Brest v. Broslan Jewelry Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 1948
274 App. Div. 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Brest v. Broslan Jewelry Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR G. BREST, Appellant, v. BROSLAN JEWELRY COMPANY, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1948

Citations

274 App. Div. 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)