From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bresler v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jul 6, 2006
No. 3:04-CV-2046-B (N.D. Tex. Jul. 6, 2006)

Summary

holding that "claims based on an alleged failure to take the oaths of office required by Texas state law do not raise a federal constitutional claim"

Summary of this case from Cavedo v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Opinion

No. 3:04-CV-2046-B.

July 6, 2006


ORDER


After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.


Summaries of

Bresler v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jul 6, 2006
No. 3:04-CV-2046-B (N.D. Tex. Jul. 6, 2006)

holding that "claims based on an alleged failure to take the oaths of office required by Texas state law do not raise a federal constitutional claim"

Summary of this case from Cavedo v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

holding that "claims based on an alleged failure to take the oaths of office required by Texas state law do not raise a federal constitutional claim"

Summary of this case from Blackburn v. Norman
Case details for

Bresler v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS RAYMOND BRESLER, 1169336, Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS DRETKE, DIRECTOR…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Jul 6, 2006

Citations

No. 3:04-CV-2046-B (N.D. Tex. Jul. 6, 2006)

Citing Cases

Dobbs v. Lumpkin

Petitioner's claim arises solely under state law and is, thus, not cognizable on federal habeas review. See…

Cavedo v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

See Cook v. Morrill, 783 F.2d 593, 595-96 (5th Cir. 1986); Caudill v. Scott, 857 F.2d 344, 345-46 (6th Cir.…