Hambrick v. Dominguez

2 Citing cases

  1. Frisco ER Facility, LLC v. McCarley

    No. 05-24-00371-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 12, 2024)

    To support its argument, Frisco ER relies on Hambrick v. Dominguez, No. 05-17-00003-CV, 2017 WL 2536916 (Tex. App.-Dallas June 12, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.)

  2. Heard v. Robles

    No. 05-22-00798-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 27, 2023)

    In reaching the foregoing conclusion, we distinguish the cases appellants rely on: Hambrick v. Dominguez, No. 05-17-00003-CV, 2017 WL 2536916, at *4 (Tex. App.-Dallas June 12, 2017, no pet.); Matagorda Nursing & Rehab. Ctr., L.L.C. v. Brooks, No. 13-16-00266-CV, 2017 WL 127867, at *6 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi- Edinburg Jan. 12, 2017, no pet.); and Tenet Hosps. Ltd. v. De La Riva, 351 S.W.3d 398, 407 (Tex. App.-El Paso 2011, no pet.). In each of these cases, the appellate court concludes that, although the expert's report and C.V. demonstrate experience and training in their area of specialization, none indicated the expert had any knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education relevant to determine whether the alleged failure to meet the relevant standard of care could or would proximately cause the complained of injury.