From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brenner v. J.J. Brenner Oyster Company

The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc
Aug 13, 1957
50 Wn. 2d 869 (Wash. 1957)

Opinion

No. 33321.

August 13, 1957.

Appeals from judgments of the superior court for Thurston county, Nos. 27884, 28332, Wright, J., entered March 14, 1955, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff in an action to quiet title and dismissing an action for trespass, in consolidated causes. Affirmed.

O'Leary, Meyer O'Leary, for appellant.

Smith Troy and Philip W. Richardson, for respondents.

W.E. Evenson and Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson Uhlmann, amici curiae on petition for rehearing.



Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adhere to the En Banc opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 48 Wn.2d 264, 292 P.2d 1052.

REPORTER'S NOTE

By order of the supreme court dated October 15, 1957, the reporter was directed not to publish any opinion of the supreme court in bound volumes of the Washington Reports while a petition for rehearing is pending, and until after the final determination if a rehearing is granted.

Pursuant to the above order, the opinions in the following cases, which were published in Vol. 150 of the Washington Decisions, have been withheld from publication in the current volume:

No. 34041 In re Leuthold's Estate No. 33869 State v. Hinkley No. 34187 Evans v. Yakima Valley Grape Growers Ass'n No. 34084 King County Employees' Ass'n v. State Employees' Retirement Board No. 34064 In re Grady v. Schneckloth REPORTER


Summaries of

Brenner v. J.J. Brenner Oyster Company

The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc
Aug 13, 1957
50 Wn. 2d 869 (Wash. 1957)
Case details for

Brenner v. J.J. Brenner Oyster Company

Case Details

Full title:ANNIE BRENNER, Respondent, v. THE J.J. BRENNER OYSTER COMPANY, Appellant…

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc

Date published: Aug 13, 1957

Citations

50 Wn. 2d 869 (Wash. 1957)
50 Wash. 2d 869
314 P.2d 417

Citing Cases

Stevens v. Stevens

[1] The law is clear in this state that, absent language specifically so providing, a quitclaim deed does not…