From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brennen v. Brennen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 13, 1989
148 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

March 13, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Campbell, J.H.O).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding counsel fees to the defendant (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237; DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete, 70 N.Y.2d 879). It would be unfair to have the wife, in effect, extinguish her assets to pay counsel fees incurred in reaching a settlement which might just as easily have been attained much earlier but for what appears to have been a lack of good faith by the husband (see, Schussler v. Schussler, 109 A.D.2d 875; Stern v. Stern, 67 A.D.2d 253).

We note that the plaintiff did not submit an affidavit in opposition to the factual allegations set forth in the defendant's affidavit. The affirmation of the plaintiff's attorney was not based upon personal knowledge and contained mere conclusory allegations (see, Metzger v. Metzger, 52 A.D.2d 1056). Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brennen v. Brennen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 13, 1989
148 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Brennen v. Brennen

Case Details

Full title:EDMUND BRENNEN, Appellant, v. ULLA BRENNEN, Respondent. BARBARA W…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1989

Citations

148 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
538 N.Y.S.2d 835

Citing Cases

Vicinanzo v. Vicinanzo

ff was awarded substantial assets, the income from those assets was factored into the court's determination…

Saslow v. Saslow

the Supreme Court providently awarded $800 per month in maintenance for a period of five years to enable the…