From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breiner v. Horn

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 26, 2008
Case No. 3:05-cv-219-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:05-cv-219-KRG-KAP.

March 26, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on March 10, 2008, docket no. 33, recommending that defendants Maue and Visinsky's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 22, be granted.

The parties were given notice that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record of this matter and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2008, it is

ORDERED that the remaining defendants' motion for summary judgment, docket no. 22, is granted. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Breiner v. Horn

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 26, 2008
Case No. 3:05-cv-219-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 2008)
Case details for

Breiner v. Horn

Case Details

Full title:GARY BREINER, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN J. HORN, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 26, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:05-cv-219-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 2008)