From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breindel v. Breindel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 29, 1949
275 App. Div. 87 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

March 29, 1949.

Appeal from Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, Family Court Division, New York County, STITT, J.

Louis Kaye for appellant.

Joseph B. Franklin for respondent.


Plaintiff's going on relief is not a condition precedent to an award for support in the Domestic Relations Court. The court should have determined, on an adequate hearing, whether there was a probability that petitioner would otherwise become a public charge ( Matter of Chandler v. Chandler, 241 App. Div. 390; Matter of Collins v. Collins, 245 App. Div. 612). The determination here was apparently made on the basis of a hospital report, without petitioner being given an opportunity to challenge the report or make a showing that she could not work and support herself. She was entitled to a trial of that issue.

The order appealed from should be reversed and the matter remanded to the Domestic Relations Court for further hearing and consideration.

PECK, P.J., GLENNON, DORE, COHN and CALLAHAN, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed and the matter remitted to the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York for further hearing and consideration.


Summaries of

Breindel v. Breindel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 29, 1949
275 App. Div. 87 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Breindel v. Breindel

Case Details

Full title:ESTHER BREINDEL, Appellant, v. JACOB BREINDEL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 29, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 87 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
87 N.Y.S.2d 357