From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brehm v. Mattus

Michigan Court of Appeals
Nov 30, 1971
194 N.W.2d 465 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Summary

In Brehm v Mattus, 37 Mich. App. 294; 194 N.W.2d 465 (1971), this Court reversed a trial court's order and remanded pursuant to the substantive principles established in a newly released Supreme Court decision.

Summary of this case from Paschke v. Retool Industries

Opinion

Docket No. 9116.

Decided November 30, 1971. Leave to appeal granted, decision of trial court reversed, and remanded for trial, 387 Mich. 759.

Ripple Chambers (by Donnelly W. Hadden), for plaintiffs.

Hartman, Beier, Howlett, McConnell Googasian, for defendant.

Before: V.J. BRENNAN, P.J., and J.H. GILLIS and T.M. BURNS, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION (ON REHEARING). This cause is controlled by the recent Supreme Court decision in Buscaino v. Rhodes (1971), 385 Mich. 474, decided after our opinion was issued.

We grant a rehearing on our own motion and the decision of the trial court is reversed. Costs to plaintiffs.


Summaries of

Brehm v. Mattus

Michigan Court of Appeals
Nov 30, 1971
194 N.W.2d 465 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

In Brehm v Mattus, 37 Mich. App. 294; 194 N.W.2d 465 (1971), this Court reversed a trial court's order and remanded pursuant to the substantive principles established in a newly released Supreme Court decision.

Summary of this case from Paschke v. Retool Industries
Case details for

Brehm v. Mattus

Case Details

Full title:BREHM v. MATTUS

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 30, 1971

Citations

194 N.W.2d 465 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
194 N.W.2d 465

Citing Cases

Paschke v. Retool Industries

Where, as in this case, a particular result is commanded by well-settled principles of adjective law, the…