From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bregman v. Klein

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 17, 1935
178 A. 774 (N.J. 1935)

Opinion

Submitted February term, 1935.

Decided May 17th, 1935.

On appeal from the court of chancery.

Mr. Louis B. Englander, for the complainant-respondent.

Mr. Milton J. Finkelstein, for the defendant-appellant.


The appeal is from an interlocutory decree in the court of chancery continuing a restraint order and denying the defendant's motion to strike the bill of complaint. We are of the opinion that the case was properly held for hearing and that there was no error either in the refusal to strike or in the refusal to dissolve the preliminary restraint.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, DONGES, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 9.

For reversal — CASE, BODINE, PERSKIE, WELLS, JJ. 4.


Summaries of

Bregman v. Klein

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 17, 1935
178 A. 774 (N.J. 1935)
Case details for

Bregman v. Klein

Case Details

Full title:EZZY BREGMAN, complainant-respondent, v. MORRIS KLEIN, defendant-appellant

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 17, 1935

Citations

178 A. 774 (N.J. 1935)
178 A. 774