From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breezy Point Cooperative, Inc. v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1996
234 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 16, 1996.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for abuse of process, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated February 13, 1996, as granted the defendant's motion for leave to file a late demand for a jury trial. Justice Thompson has been substituted for the late Justice Hart ( see, 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Before: Miller, J.P., Thompson, Altman and Goldstein, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In view of the absence of prejudice to the plaintiffs and the defendant's demonstration that his waiver of the right to a jury trial was inadvertent and unintentional, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant's motion ( see, CPLR 4102 [e]; Ossory Trading v Geldermann, Inc., 200 AD2d 423; Lane v Marshall, 89 AD2d 579).


Summaries of

Breezy Point Cooperative, Inc. v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1996
234 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Breezy Point Cooperative, Inc. v. Young

Case Details

Full title:BREEZY POINT COOPERATIVE, INC., et al., Appellants, v. THOMAS H. YOUNG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 896

Citing Cases

Rial v. Lee

The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that their affirmative request in their note of issue for a "[t]rial…

Dunn v. Newcombe

Finally, the unopposed motion by Popei's for an order permitting it to file a late demand for a jury trial is…