From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breeze v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1937
249 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

January 29, 1937.


In an action to recover for the death of plaintiff's intestate, a four-year-old boy, whose body was found in the water that had accumulated within the foundation walls on defendant Lavine's land, a verdict was rendered against both defendants, and judgment entered thereon. Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. An owner of land is not liable in damages for injuries to a bare licensee or trespasser resulting from a mere defect in the premises. ( Olsen v. Fennia Realty Co., Inc., 246 N.Y. 641; Vaughan v. Transit Development Co., 222 id. 79, 82; Mendelowitz v. Neisner, 258 id. 181, and cases cited therein.) The city of New York had no control over the premises where the boy was drowned. Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Breeze v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1937
249 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Breeze v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BREEZE, as Administrator, etc., of ROBERT BREEZE, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1937

Citations

249 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

Panunzio v. State of New York

" ( Vaughan v. Transit Development Co., 222 N.Y. 79.) The only duty the State owes to a trespasser or a bare…

Molnar v. Slattery Contr. Co.

He is not liable in damages to a trespasser or bare licensee for a mere defect in the premises. ( Breeze v.…