From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breen v. Cunard Lines Steamship Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 1973
41 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

March 20, 1973


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 22, 1972, denying motion by third-party defendant, insurer Liberty Mutual, for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion granted, and the complaint in Action No. 2 dismissed. Appellant shall recover of respondent Cunard $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The issue is solely one in respect of the unambiguous language of the policy, and a person, other than the named insured is covered only if he is a lessee or borrower of an automobile or an employee of the named insured, or of such lessee or borrower. And there is nothing on this submission indicating that Cunard was a lessee, borrower or employee of the insured or of a lessee or borrower. Accordingly, we perceive no question of fact, and we grant the motion.

Concur — McGivern, J.P., Kupferman, Murphy, Lane and Tilzer, JJ.


Summaries of

Breen v. Cunard Lines Steamship Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 1973
41 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

Breen v. Cunard Lines Steamship Co.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BREEN, Respondent, v. CUNARD LINES STEAMSHIP COMPANY LIMITED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 20, 1973

Citations

41 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Ferber v. Waco Trucking, Inc.

The insurance policy in relevant part, in clear unambiguous terms, limits the loading/unloading coverage to…