Summary
explaining that "[t]he presumption prevails that the offense was committed at a time when the punishment assessed was applicable"
Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. StateOpinion
No. 27378.
January 26, 1955.
Appeal from the County Court, Baylor County, James F. Lester, J.
No attorney on appeal for appellant.
Wesley Dice, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
This is a conviction upon a plea of guilty to the offense of driving while intoxicated, a fine of $50 having been assessed.
The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception.
The presumption prevails that the offense was committed at a time when the punishment assessed was applicable. See Scates v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 274 S.W.2d 833.
The judgment is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.