Since Smith preserved none of his arguments about improper comments, we review the contested comments for fundamental error. SeeBreeden v. State , 226 So. 3d 336, 337 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). A fundamental error is one that "reaches down into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty could not have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error."
Appellant did not object to the comment, and so we review it for fundamental error. SeeBreeden v. State , 226 So. 3d 336, 336–37 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). Appellant relies on Nurse v. State , 932 So. 2d 290, 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), where the prosecutor stated that the defendant no longer had the presumption of innocence.